Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Saha, Sanket"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Extending UniBreak: Semantic Retrieval and Harmful-Intent Direction Suppression for Token-Level LLM Jailbreaking
    (Indian Statistical Institute, 2026-06-15) Saha, Sanket
    Token-level adversarial perturbations remain one of the most efficient known attacks against the safety alignment of instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs). Among recent works, the UniBreak framework (You et al., 2026) stands out for unifying gradient-based optimization with an evolutionary perturbation repository. However, its repository relies solely on accumulated success frequency without utilizing query content, and its fitness function implicitly assumes that suppressing refusal tokens is sufficient to elicit harmful responses. In this dissertation, we extend UniBreak along both axes and re-evaluates the framework under stricter generalization and judgment protocols. Specifically, we introduce a semantic perturbation repository that replaces frequency-only repository retrieval and geometric interpolation between historical frequency and sentence-encoder cosine similarity. Furthermore, we use Harmful-Intent Direction Suppression (HIDS) to augment the fitness function by explicitly penalizing the model’s residual-stream projection onto a validated harmful-intent direction. To isolate genuine cross-query generalization from within-dataset memorization, we introduce a two-phase frozen-repository evaluation protocol. Results are evaluated under two complementary judges: a binary classification judge and a 0-10 actionability scoring judge.The scoring judge itself is subsequently analysed through Grad×Input attribution.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify